All posts by Mukund Mohan

My discipline will beat your intellect

Claude Code Web Just Made the 10X Engineer 100X – the real take

The uncomfortable truth nobody wants to say out loud:

Claude Code Web’s multi-threading capability doesn’t democratize coding—it weaponizes talent disparity.

Here’s why this is the most polarizing development in software engineering since GitHub Copilot, except way more brutal:

For the 10X engineer: You’re not just 10X anymore. You’re 100X. Why? Because while mediocre developers are still figuring out how to write a coherent prompt for ONE task, you’re orchestrating six parallel threads like a conductor leading a symphony. You understand:

  • Which tasks can run independently
  • How to structure problems for maximum parallelization
  • How to review and integrate multiple streams of AI output simultaneously
  • When to let threads run and when to intervene

Your systems thinking and architectural intuition now have a force multiplier that compounds exponentially. You’re not coding anymore—you’re conducting an orchestra of AI agents.

For everyone else: The skill gap just became a chasm. The “democratization of coding” narrative is a lie. Claude Code Web is actually a skill amplifier, and amplifiers make disparities worse, not better.

Think about it: Give a novice a power tool, they might hurt themselves. Give a master craftsman that same tool, they’ll build a cathedral in a weekend.

Why This Take Makes People Furious

The optimists hate it because it suggests AI won’t level the playing field—it’ll tilt it further toward those who already excel.

The traditionalists hate it because it admits that the future belongs to those who can think in parallel, manage complexity, and trust AI—not those who can write the most elegant manual code.

The “learn to code” crowd hates it because it suggests that raw coding skill matters less than orchestration, architecture, and prompt engineering—skills that take years of experience to develop.

The Nuclear Take

The 1X engineer using Claude Code Web will feel productive. They’ll ship features. They’ll think they’re keeping up.

But the 10X engineer? They’re building entire systems in the time it takes others to build features. They’re parallelizing not just tasks, but learning—running multiple experiments, testing architectures, exploring solutions simultaneously.

The productivity gap isn’t additive. It’s multiplicative. And multi-threading just added another multiplier to the equation.

Welcome to the era where “knowing how to code” is table stakes, and “knowing how to orchestrate complexity” is what separates the architects from the assembly line.

The reality is a lot more nuanced.

The Multi-Threading Reality Check

What’s genuinely true:

  • Multi-threading in Claude Code Web is a legitimate productivity multiplier for specific types of work
  • Being able to run parallel tasks (different features, tests, documentation, refactoring) simultaneously is powerful
  • People who understand system architecture and task decomposition will extract more value from this

What’s overstated in my hot take:

  • The “100X” multiplier is absurd hyperbole. Real productivity gains are meaningful but not magical
  • Most experienced developers were already good at context-switching and managing multiple concerns—this just makes it more explicit
  • Junior developers can absolutely learn to think in parallel; it’s not some mystical gift

The Actual Democratization Story

Here’s the nuance: AI tools like Claude Code Web are both democratizing AND widening skill gaps. Both things are true simultaneously.

Democratization that’s real:

  • Someone with a CS degree from 2010 who’s been out of the loop can get back up to speed faster
  • People can build prototypes and MVPs without needing a full team
  • The barrier to “I have an idea” → “I have a working thing” is genuinely lower
  • Junior developers can learn by doing, faster than ever before

Skill gaps that are real:

  • Experienced engineers produce higher-quality architecture when using AI tools
  • Code review skills matter MORE now, not less (you need to spot AI mistakes)
  • Understanding what to build and why still requires domain expertise
  • Prompt engineering is just communication skills + technical knowledge—which experienced people have more of

The Thing Nobody Talks About

The real difference-maker isn’t raw talent or experience—it’s judgment.

With Claude Code Web’s multi-threading, you need to know:

  • Is this task actually parallelizable or will it create merge conflicts?
  • Which threads need my attention first?
  • When is the AI going down the wrong path and needs correction?
  • What’s the right level of granularity for task decomposition?

This is learnable. It’s not magic. But it does take practice.

The Uncomfortable Middle Ground

The honest truth is probably something like:

For experienced developers: You’ll see 2-5x productivity gains on the right kinds of projects. You’ll still hit walls. You’ll still need to think hard about architecture. But yeah, you’ll ship faster.

For junior developers: You’ll learn faster and ship more than junior developers of previous generations. But you might also develop some bad habits if you don’t understand what the AI is doing. Your growth depends on how much you interrogate the code, not just accept it.

For the industry: We’re probably going to see a bifurcation:

  • Teams that learn to leverage these tools effectively will massively outperform
  • Teams that treat AI as a magic wand will produce buggy, unmaintainable code faster than ever
  • The “10X engineer” concept might evolve into “10X teams” who know how to orchestrate both humans and AI

What This Really Means

The multi-threading capability is less about individual genius and more about:

  1. Workflow optimization – Can you structure your work to take advantage of parallelism?
  2. Risk tolerance – Are you comfortable letting AI run while you focus elsewhere?
  3. Integration skills – Can you merge multiple streams of work coherently?

These are learnable, practicable skills. They’re not reserved for some mythical 10X engineer.

The Actually Controversial Take

Here’s what might genuinely be controversial: The era of the lone wolf “10X engineer” might actually be ending.

Why? Because the most effective use of multi-threaded AI coding is collaborative. The best outcomes will come from:

  • Teams that can decompose problems together
  • Engineers who can review AI output quickly and effectively
  • Organizations that can create feedback loops between multiple AI threads and multiple human reviewers

The “100X engineer” narrative assumes scaling is individual. But maybe the real story is that effective AI tooling makes collaboration scale in ways we haven’t seen before.

AI is optimized for the Median. The future belongs to the outliers

LLMs aren’t “creative.”

They’re statistical compression of everything that already exists.

They don’t invent—they average. Their job is literally:

“Given all the design patterns in the world, what’s the most probable next pixel, word, or layout?”

That means AI is gravitationally pulled toward the center of the bell curve. It is designed to be safe.

And safe is the enemy of great.


What AI naturally produces:

Layouts that look familiar. Color palettes that “work” Components that follow convention. Slightly-above-average Dribbble-style UIs. Translation: Pleasant, polished, predictable. Good enough to impress non-designers. Not good enough to move culture.


What AI instinctively avoids (because the data rarely contains it):

  • Bold new patterns nobody has tried
  • Weird layouts that break grids
  • Pixel-perfect craft (it blurs details)
  • High information density (it simplifies)
  • High constraint problems (logos, complex UI)
  • Subtle brand identity
  • Clever metaphor or symbolism
  • Risky opinions

Why? Because the median is safe. And the median dominates the training data.


AI = Safe.

Great Design = Opinionated. Great design is not the “average of what’s been done.” Great design is a decision, a stance, a refusal to blend in. AI is optimized to remove risk. Humans are valuable because we’re willing to take it.


Design is about taste—and taste can’t be averaged.

AI finds the midpoint. Taste lives at the edges. Taste says:

“Everyone is doing X… so I’ll do Y.”

Taste is judgment under constraints—not pattern recall.


The Beige Flood is Coming.

As AI becomes more accessible:

  • Every founder can generate “good-looking” screens.
  • Every template will feel AI-polished.
  • Every landing page will look interchangeable.

We will drown in pleasant, soulless UI. Everything will look… fine. And fine is the new ugly.


In that world, human taste becomes a luxury good.

When everything is mass-produced and “pretty,” What stands out? Not polish. Personality. Not symmetry. Story. Not correctness. Character. In a sea of AI beige, the rare work with soul, sharpness, or a strong opinion will feel electric. People will pay for it. Brands will compete for it. Users will crave it.


AI will dominate production. Humans will dominate direction.

AI can generate infinite “good.” But only humans can define what “great” even is. The winners aren’t the ones who prompt the fastest. They’re the ones who see what AI cannot see. The edge. The vibe. The future.


Conclusion:

AI is the new baseline.

Outliers are the new competitive advantage.

If you’re just “good,” AI will replace you. If you’re bold, specific, opinionated, weird, wildly human? AI can’t follow you there.That’s where the future is.

Learning requires discomfort. How to succeed with Vibe Coding

The New Rules of Vibe Coding: Why “Easy” Is Making You Worse

In 2019, coding education had one enemy: tutorial hell.

You’d watch 6-hour videos, code along flawlessly… and then freeze the moment you had to build something from scratch.

So we fixed that.

We built interactive courses, hands-on projects, fewer videos. Tutorial hell faded away.

But something new took its place.

Welcome to Vibe Coding Hell.

This time, we can build things—sometimes shockingly cool things.

But they’re built with AI, for AI, and under AI supervision.

“I can’t build without Cursor.”

“Claude wrote 6,379 lines to lazy-load my images—must be right?”

“Here’s my project: localhost:3000.”

The problem isn’t output.

The problem is mental models.

Projects are shipping, but understanding is not.

And here’s the uncomfortable truth:

Learning only happens when you feel discomfort.

Tutorial hell let you avoid discomfort by watching someone else code.

Vibe coding hell lets you avoid discomfort by letting AI code for you.

Both lead to the same outcome:

You don’t wrestle with the problem. Your brain never rewires.

“But AI makes me more productive!”

Maybe. Maybe not.

A 2025 study found developers believed AI made them 20–25% faster…

…but in reality, AI slowed them down by 19%.

Speed without understanding is an illusion.

It’s motion, not progress.

And the psychological risk is even bigger:

“Why learn this? AI already knows it.”

If AI doesn’t take our jobs, demotivation will.

The New Rules of Vibe Coding (If you actually want to learn):

❌ Don’t use AI to write the code for you.

No autocomplete. No agent mode. No “build the whole feature.”

✅ Do use AI to think with you.

Explain this. Challenge me. Ask me questions. Show me another approach.

❌ Don’t ask for step-by-step instructions.

That’s just a tutorial with extra steps.

✅ Do ask: “What am I missing?” or “Where could this break?”

Force your brain into active problem-solving.

❌ Don’t accept AI’s first confident answer.

LLMs are sycophants. They’ll tell you what you want to hear.

✅ Do demand sources, real-world examples, and opposing opinions.

That’s where real learning lives.

The Hard Truth

Learning must feel uncomfortable.

Not because struggle is noble.

Because struggle triggers growth.

When you’re stuck, frustrated, and pushing through uncertainty—that’s your neural network literally rewiring.

AI shouldn’t remove that pain.

AI should sharpen it into clarity.

If AI makes coding effortless, it’s making you weaker.

If AI makes thinking deeper, it’s making you unstoppable.

Vibe Coding isn’t the problem.

Vibe Coding without discomfort is.

The future belongs to the developers who learn how to use AI as a thinking partner—

not a crutch.

Real work. Real struggle. Real skill.

That’s the new vibe.

Speed as a moat for startups – the new defensible positions for early stage companies

Founders are obsessed with moats right now—and for good reason. In a world of near-infinite competition, margins trend to zero unless you can defend something real. But here’s the uncomfortable truth: early on, the only moat you actually have is speed.

Not “we ship fast-ish.” I mean Cursor-level speed—one-day sprints in 2023–2024—while big companies take weeks, months, sometimes years to push features through PRDs and committee. In greenfield markets where nobody knows which products matter yet, the team that cycles daily and learns fastest wins the right to worry about moats later.

Speed is missing from Hamilton Helmer’s Seven Powers, but it shouldn’t be. It’s the gateway power. Ship relentlessly; make something people truly want; then stack the classic moats as you scale. That’s the actual sequence. If you’ve got nothing valuable yet, your “moat” is just a puddle.

Once you have traction, process power shows up first. Think of what banks demand from AI agents handling KYC or loan origination. A hackathon demo gets you 80% of the way with 20% of the effort; production-grade reliability on tens of thousands of decisions per day requires the last 1–5% to work almost all the time—and that last mile takes 10–100× the effort. That drudgery is a moat. Plaid-style surface area across thousands of financial endpoints, CI/CD that never breaks, evals that catch edge cases—this is why Stripe, Rippling, and Gusto are hard to copy. Better engineering, done repeatedly, compounds.

Cornered resources come next. Sure, in pharma that’s patents. In modern AI, it’s privileged access: regulated buyers, DoD environments, or proprietary customer workflows and data you collect by being a forward-deployed engineering team. That proprietary data lets you tune models and prompts so your unit economics improve—Character-AI-style 10× serving cost reductions are the blueprint. Having your own best-in-class model helps, but it’s not mandatory on day one; careful context engineering will get you 80–90% of what customers need for the first two years.

Switching costs are evolving, too. The old world was Oracle or Salesforce: migrating schemas and retraining a sales org could cost a year of productivity. LLMs will lower those data-migration costs, but AI startups are creating a new lock-in: months-long onboarding that encodes custom logic and compliance into agents. Six- to twelve-month pilots that convert to seven-figure contracts make a second bake-off irrational. On the consumer side, memory is becoming sticky—tools that actually remember you raise the pain of leaving.

Counter-positioning is quietly lethal. Incumbent SaaS sells per seat; good agents reduce seats. The better their AI, the more revenue they cannibalize. Startups price on work delivered or tasks completed—and then they actually deliver. That culture shift is nontrivial for late-stage incumbents. Second movers who out-execute often win: legal AI teams focusing on application quality over fine-tuning aesthetics; customer support agents like Giga ML that “just work” faster in onboarding. Agents also have superhuman edges: instantly handle 200 languages, infinite patience on bad connections. In vertical SaaS, this flips wallet share: from ~1% “software” take to 4–10% when you absorb operations (AOKA’s HVAC support example). That’s not a feature; that’s a business model moat.

Network effects in AI look like data flywheels and eval pipelines, not just “more friends = more fun.” The more usage you have, the more ground-truth failures you capture, the better your prompts, tools, and models get. Cursor’s telemetry—every keystroke improving autocomplete—compounds quality. Brand still matters (ask Google how it feels to chase ChatGPT), but the durable edge is usage → data → better product → more usage.

Finally, scale economies mostly live at the foundation layer. Training frontier models and crawling large slices of the web (think EXA’s “search for agents”) are capital-intensive, with low marginal costs at scale. Even with DeepSeek-style RL efficiencies, the base models remain expensive—another reason application-layer speed matters early.

So here’s the playbook. Find existential pain—work that’s so broken someone’s promotion or business is on the line. Ship daily until you own that pain. Use the speed moat to earn time, users, and cash. Then layer in process power, cornered resources, switching costs, counter-positioning, network/data effects, and—when relevant—scale. Think five years out, sure, but execute like you only have five days. Because in the beginning, you do.

Is ChatGPT sending more customers or Google for B2B customers?

Overview

Recent analysis of client web traffic compared traditional Google organic search sessions with attributable traffic from AI tools (primarily ChatGPT, with smaller volumes from Perplexity and others). The goal was to understand the ratio of SEO-driven traffic to AI-driven traffic and identify implications for marketing strategy.

Key Findings

  1. SEO traffic remains strong and growing. Across clients, organic sessions from Google continue to trend upward. In multiple cases, traffic has scaled from under 100 sessions to several thousand per month. Publishing high-intent, bottom-funnel content continues to drive measurable growth.
  2. AI traffic is rising but remains small. AI referrals began appearing in mid-2024 and show steady growth. However, the volume remains modest:
    • On average, AI traffic is ~3% of SEO traffic.
    • Most accounts fall in the 2–5% range, with outliers as low as 0.2% and as high as 7%.
    • Nearly all AI traffic originates from ChatGPT, though conversions sometimes come from other platforms like Perplexity.
  3. Perceived SEO decline is often attributional. Slight declines in organic traffic have been observed in some mature accounts. However, these dips often coincide with increases in branded search traffic. This suggests users may discover companies through AI overviews or AI search results but then navigate via direct or branded searches rather than clicking organic links.
  4. Conversions do not align directly with traffic. While ChatGPT contributes the majority of measurable AI sessions, conversions are often driven by other tools. This highlights the need to evaluate AI channels on conversion performance, not traffic volume alone.
  5. Attribution challenges are intensifying. Cookie consent, privacy changes, and shifts in user click paths make it harder to tie conversions directly to SEO or AI sources. Many conversions appear as “direct/none,” despite being influenced by search or AI exposure.

Strategic Implications

  • SEO is not dead. Organic growth remains consistent, and claims of its demise are not supported by the data.
  • AI traffic is complementary, not a replacement. It is increasing but represents a single-digit share of SEO volume and conversions.
  • Brands should view SEO and AI as interconnected. Visibility in search engines feeds AI discovery, and vice versa. Both channels ultimately contribute to brand awareness and lead generation.
  • Conversion measurement must evolve. Teams should place greater emphasis on overall lead growth and blended attribution, rather than expecting precise channel-level credit.

Conclusion

Current evidence shows SEO continues to be a primary driver of traffic and conversions, while AI referrals are emerging but still limited in scale. The most effective strategy is not choosing between SEO and AI but understanding how the two reinforce each other in driving brand discovery and measurable outcomes.

How to Increase AI Visibility (Common Mistakes People Make)

Featured

I just watched a great episode from The Grow and Convert Marketing Show that breaks down the exact question many of us in marketing have been asking: what should we actually do to increase our AI visibility? The episode cuts through the noise and fearmongering from some of the AI visibility tools and gives a clear, practical framework you can use today. Here’s the short, friendly recap I’d share with a colleague—what I learned, what to avoid, and a simple plan you can implement this week.

Why marketers are suddenly anxious about AI visibility

First, the context: a bunch of CMOs, founders, and marketing leads are opening up AI visibility dashboards, seeing competitors “winning,” and getting understandably nervous. The common pattern is this: an SEO/AI tool runs a bunch of prompts, tallies how often your brand is mentioned in AI overviews, spits out a single percentage or “share of voice,” and then you look bad on paper.

That panic is often misplaced. The episode makes a core point I agree with: these tools tend to prioritize quantity over quality. They measure how frequently your brand appears across a wide net of prompts—but they don’t judge whether those prompts actually matter to your business. In other words, a high visibility score that’s driven by irrelevant, top-of-funnel, or non-buying-intent queries isn’t valuable.

The common traps: irrelevant prompts and false comparisons

Two client examples from the episode illustrate this well:

  • A B2B software client saw a competitor showing up in AI overviews for a bunch of queries like “things to do in Illinois,” “most visited cities,” and city-specific travel guides. That competitor publishes consumer-facing content, so they naturally appeared in those AI prompts. But our B2B client sells software to vacation-related businesses—not consumer travel guides—so those AI mentions are largely meaningless.
  • A look at SEMrush’s AI brand performance demo for Warby Parker showed a “share of voice” percentage and dozens of specific queries. Some prompts made total sense (e.g., “Which retailers have the best customer reviews for eyewear?”) and mattered to Warby Parker. Other prompts—like “Who offers in-app virtual try-on for glasses?”—might be irrelevant or of very low commercial value.

Both examples show the same problem: tools give a big-picture metric without filtering for intent or business relevance. That metric can make leaders panic even when the brand is doing the right things for its customers.

Two rules that will save you from unnecessary panic

If you remember only two things from this article (and the episode), let them be these:

  1. Intent matters. Not all prompts are equal. A mention in a “what are fun things to do in Springfield” overview is not the same as ranking in an AI overview for “best property management software for vacation rentals.” Pick queries aligned to buying intent.
  2. SEO fundamentals still matter most. From the data referenced in the episode and our own observations, there’s a strong correlation between ranking in Google search results and showing up in AI overviews (including ChatGPT and Google’s AI responses). So prioritize the core things that make you rank well on Google.

How AI overviews actually decide what to show

The episode summarizes this neatly into two inputs that influence LLM answers like ChatGPT and Google AI overviews:

  • Training data: The LLM’s broad knowledge built from public datasets, books, podcasts, and web content. Getting into that training data is a long-term brand effort—centuries of marketing activities add up here.
  • Live web search: Many LLMs “search the web” when they don’t have enough internal information, and they use Google or other web sources. That makes your presence in current Google search results a very direct lever to influence AI answers.

Practically: focusing on appearing in top Google results (your domain or reputable third-party pages that mention you) is the most tangible way to influence whether AI mentions your brand.

A simple, practical framework you can implement today

Stop staring at a single “AI visibility” percentage and start controlling what matters. Here’s a step-by-step playbook I’d use right now if I were advising a marketing team with limited budget:

  1. Pick 5–10 core topics (not a thousand prompts). These should be the queries that directly indicate buying intent and align with your product. Examples: “prescription glasses online,” “equipment rental software,” “best content marketing agency for SaaS.” Keep them tight and product-focused.
  2. Map intent for each topic. Decide whether each topic is TOFU (top of funnel), MOFU, or BOFU (bottom of funnel) and what a successful outcome looks like: visits, demo signups, trial starts, or direct conversions.
  3. Audit your current rankings. For those 5–10 topics, track where your pages currently appear in Google. Do this monthly. You can use a paid tool or a simple spreadsheet with manual checks.
  4. Fix and optimize your pages. Update content, clarify intent, add conversion opportunities, and ensure pages answer the user’s question better than competitors. This is classic SEO content work—do it well.
  5. Earn placements on other relevant pages/lists. If other sites produce “best of” lists or roundups for these topics, get on them. Traditional PR outreach and relationship building still work here—email editors, share case studies, provide data, and be helpful.
  6. Monitor AI overviews for those topics, not your overall percentage. If you want, use an AI-tracking tool and focus reporting on those 5–10 queries rather than a single share-of-voice metric.
  7. Be wary of short-term “hacks.” Commenting across many Reddit threads, paying for placement, or other manipulative tactics might give transient wins. They’re not a substitute for sustainable SEO and product-driven marketing.

Examples of good vs. bad AI visibility efforts

From the episode, here’s how to classify potential activities:

  • Good: Updating core product pages and buying-intent content. This improves organic rankings and is likely to increase AI mentions in meaningful ways.
  • Good: Earning placements on authoritative lists that already rank well. That amplifies signals without being spammy.
  • Less useful: Trying to rank for dozens of irrelevant prompts the tool suggests. This wastes effort on topics that won’t convert.
  • Risky: Paying for placements that violate policies or trying to game AI algorithms with low-quality tactics. Short-term gains can become long-term penalties.

What about expensive AI visibility tools?

There are helpful tools out there that can automate monitoring and give you a big dashboard. But if you can’t justify the budget, you don’t need them to make progress. The hosts suggested a pragmatic alternative:

  • Pick your 5–10 priorities, build a simple spreadsheet, and check them periodically.
  • Have your team discuss status and actions every month. This focuses your efforts on topics that matter.

If you do decide to invest in a tool later, you’ll have clarity on which queries you care about and can ask the tool to monitor those specifically—rather than relying on whatever list it auto-generates.

Final takeaways — what I’m telling my team

If you’re feeling that uneasiness after opening an AI visibility report, here’s the friend-to-friend advice I’d give:

  • Don’t panic over a single share-of-voice number. It’s easy to misinterpret. Ask: which prompts contribute to that number, and do those prompts matter?
  • Pick a handful of meaningful queries and own them. Monitoring and optimizing 5–10 buying-intent topics is far more productive than chasing hundreds of irrelevant prompts.
  • Double down on SEO basics. Strong organic ranking signals are the most reliable way to influence AI outputs today. Create great content, earn links, and fix UX/conversion issues.
  • Use PR and list placements strategically. Getting on trusted lists that already appear in search results is a sensible, scalable tactic to increase the chances AI tools reference you.
  • Avoid reliance on hacky short-term tactics. They might work momentarily, but long-term brand and product strength wins.

“Do the basics. If you’re not doing the basics right now, then you’re going to have a lot harder time showing up in AI.” — Summarized from The Grow and Convert Marketing Show

How to get started this week (quick checklist)

  1. Pick 5–10 product-related topics with clear buying intent.
  2. Search each topic on Google and note the top 3–5 results.
  3. Audit your content for those topics—are you answering the searcher’s question? Is there a clear conversion path?
  4. Update or create the highest-value pages first (optimize for intent and conversions).
  5. Identify 3 external sites/lists where your brand should appear and start outreach.
  6. Set a monthly review to check rankings and AI overview presence for your chosen topics.

Closing thought

AI visibility is real and worth thinking about, but it’s not a magic replacement for SEO or product-driven growth. Focus on the queries that drive value, do the SEO fundamentals well, and use PR/list placements to complement your efforts. If you do that, the AI mentions will follow—without the panic and without wasting resources on irrelevant metrics.

If you want to dive deeper, follow The Grow and Convert Marketing Show for more breakdowns like the one I summarized—it’s a great resource for practical, no-nonsense marketing advice.

How are people using ChatGPT – research report summary

ChatGPT launched in November 2022. By July 2025, 18 billion messages were being sent each week by 700 million users, representing around 10% of the global adult population.

The first full research paper on its use was published today.

Non work messages now represent over 70% of all ChatGPT messages.

The share of messages related to computer coding is relatively small: only 4.2% of ChatGPT messages are related to computer programming, compared to 33% of work-related Claude conversations.

The share of messages related to companionship or social-emotional issues is fairly small: only 1.9% of ChatGPT messages are on the topic of Relationships and Personal Reflection.

The gender gap in ChatGPT usage has likely narrowed considerably over time, and may have closed completely.

AI and Affiliate Marketing: How I Build Content Engines That Actually Move the Business

I recently sat down with Mukund Mohan on his Seattle Side and the East Side podcast to walk through how I think about content, SEO, AI, and affiliate marketing in 2025. I wanted to capture that conversation here—what I’ve learned since my first job out of college at Kissmetrics, what I’d do differently if I were starting today, and the concrete playbook I use now to help B2B companies grow traffic, leads, and revenue.

Table of Contents

Two-minute backstory (so you know where I’m coming from)

My career began when Neil Patel hired me into a marketing role at Kissmetrics. I was an entry-level content marketer—writing blog posts and support documentation, shipping content, building a knowledge base. That blog became legendary. People loved the content so much they used to say they loved the Kissmetrics blog more than the product itself.

Since then I’ve led content teams across startups, founded my own company, and co-founded Stone Press—a B2B affiliate SEO company that scaled aggressively. We drove millions in revenue through SEO, inbound, conversion optimization, and building high-performing teams. We grew to a meaningful business, but platform shifts and core changes in Google’s ranking algorithm hit us hard and forced a pivot. Now I help clients stand up or revitalize their B2B content programs, bringing lessons from both the golden SEO era and the messy, AI-driven present.

What would I do differently if I were hired into a startup in 2025?

If I were starting today in a VC-backed analytics or SaaS company, my role would look familiar but with sharper structure and modern tooling. I’d still be focused on content: blog posts, landing pages, and support articles. But the workflows would leverage AI in tactical ways—especially for speed and iteration—while maintaining a human-first editorial lens.

The core, timeless playbook I still believe in is: write content that impacts people, ship consistently, and distribute through multiple channels. That means building personal brands around the work, maintaining an engaged email list, and ensuring content distribution isn’t dependent on a single platform.

Where 2025 is different is in tooling and distribution risk. AI can accelerate content ops—for ideation, outlines, first drafts, and even keyword research. But it’s also saturating channels with low-quality content. That makes authentic, human insight more visible. If you can create genuinely human content—insightful, narrow, opinionated—you stand out more now than ever because AI content has homogenized a lot of the signal.

Editorial vs SEO-first: When to choose which

There’s a temptation to swing between editorial magazine-style content and pure SEO-driven growth. My experience is that both approaches are valuable—and they can complement each other when done intentionally.

  • Editorial-first: Great for brand building, thought leadership, and multi-channel distribution (email, social, podcasts). You ship consistently and build a following.
  • SEO-first: Great for predictable, compounding traffic. Focused on bottom-of-funnel pages, evergreen informational content, and systematic updates.

In the past I leaned heavily into editorial and then swung too far into SEO because it delivered consistent ROI. My regret was not doubling down on SEO in one of my projects when it would’ve produced far larger returns. Today I typically architect a hybrid: establish a tight SEO foundation for bottom-of-funnel pages, then layer editorial content and multichannel distribution on top to diversify acquisition.

“Content that impacts people, shipping really consistently. Multi-channel distribution. Build personal brands and a tight email list—then tie everything into a flywheel.”

How I use AI in content operations (without letting it ruin the brand)

AI is a tool, not a replacement. I use it to accelerate research, generate outlines, and scale repetitious tasks (like support article first drafts). But I push back on purely AI-generated outputs being published as-is. The role AI plays is to free up human time for judgment, angle, and unique insight.

Some practical ways I use AI:

  1. Keyword discovery and clustering at scale to inform a content plan.
  2. Drafting outlines and iterating headlines rapidly so writers can focus on insight and voice.
  3. Creating summarized research and citation lists for complex topics to speed the subject-matter expert’s drafting.
  4. Automating repetitive support content generation, then reviewing and humanizing it before publishing.

That said, there’s a lot of low-effort AI content out there. You can spot it: a certain flatness in voice, generic examples, and predictable structure. If humans can create authentic content—even something simple like “hello, here’s our human perspective”—that authenticity stands out. The bar for “human” is lower now, because AI-created content often lacks personality.

B2B affiliate marketing—what it is, why it matters, and how I think about it

Affiliate marketing in B2B is underrated. It absolutely works for SaaS companies serving SMBs and mid-market customers. Enterprise is trickier because volumes are lower and buying cycles are longer, but for many SaaS categories affiliate is a significant channel.

The important shift is that affiliate programs do more than just drive direct commissions. They influence who gets mentioned across the web, which affects SEO signals, social buzz, and even the data LLMs learn from. The web is an ecosystem: publishers, review sites, listicles, and micro-influencers all create the signal that search engines and large language models consume. If your competitors are actively courting those publishers with affiliate incentives and you aren’t, you’re losing share of voice.

“If the number three company in the category is willing to pay and number one and two don’t, publishers will feature number three. That mention ripples into search, social, and LLM training data.”

How affiliate programs change discovery

Think of it this way: publishers and content creators monetize by recommending tools. If they can earn an affiliate commission for recommending Product C, they will—especially if Products A and B don’t have a competitive program. As those articles and listicles propagate, they feed into search signals and the datasets used by LLMs. Over time that visibility compounds, which is why affiliate programs are strategic, not just tactical.

Who to recruit as affiliates and how to reach them

I use a two-pronged approach: inbound + targeted outreach.

  • Inbound funnel: Maintain a clean signup flow and manage it actively. You’ll get high-volume, low-quality inbound, but occasionally a “golden goose” will sign up. Treat inbound as a lead channel and screen it.
  • Targeted outreach: Cold outreach to niche publishers, micro-influencers, and up-and-coming creators. Start small—don’t try to land the top-tier publications immediately. Work your way up the ladder.

The sweet spot is publishers who are hungry, have category-aligned audiences, and don’t already have lucrative deals with incumbents. Offer fair commissions, provide strong creative assets, and build relationships. Micro-influencers and niche YouTube channels are often easier wins than the big review sites early on.

When should you start an affiliate program?

My older view was: build SEO and product-market fit first, then bolt on affiliates. Now I often recommend launching an affiliate program earlier—especially if you’re entering an established category where mentions matter. If search and LLM outputs already favor incumbents, you need every lever available to flip mentions and shape narrative.

A practical sequencing I like:

  1. Get your SEO foundation in place: homepage, pricing page, competitor/alternatives pages, key vs/roundup posts.
  2. Run modest bottom-of-funnel paid ads if it makes sense to buy initial conversions and test messaging.
  3. Launch an affiliate program early enough to start getting mentions from niche publishers and micro-influencers.
  4. Layer on editorial and multi-channel distribution to build brand and email lists.

For SEO foundation, a small company only needs 15–30 high-quality pages to start: landing pages, pricing, comparison pages, a handful of evergreen posts. Those pages should be architected for conversion and updated regularly—ideally quarterly. Freshness matters now more than it used to.

Pricing pages and the unforgiving nature of discovery

One concrete example I shared on the podcast: I’ve audited companies where the pricing page had a noindex tag. That tag tells search engines to ignore the page entirely, meaning potential customers can’t easily find pricing via search. If users can’t discover pricing, conversions and organic visibility suffer. That shows how small technical issues can cripple discovery—especially when everything else seems “hot” and working around them.

Practical steps to launch an affiliate program that scales

Here’s a checklist I use when helping clients stand up affiliate programs:

  1. Decide pricing and commission structure aligned to LTV and margins.
  2. Choose an affiliate platform that integrates with your tracking and payout needs.
  3. Create dedicated affiliate landing pages and tracking links (UTMs) so you can attribute properly.
  4. Build an affiliate resource hub: creatives, copy snippets, demo videos, comparison charts, and onboarding guides.
  5. Start outreach to niche publishers and micro-influencers with tailored offers and co-marketing ideas.
  6. Monitor performance, optimize commissions and creative, and slowly trade up to higher-authority publishers.
  7. Integrate affiliates into broader BD and PR outreach—affiliate relationships often open doors for partnerships.

Wrap-up: diversify, humanize, and build durable systems

If there’s one through-line to everything I’ve learned, it’s this: don’t be hostage to one channel or one platform. Build a content engine that combines a solid SEO foundation, human editorial voice, smart use of AI to accelerate operations, and strategic affiliate programs to earn mentions across the web.

AI is a force multiplier when used correctly—but it’s not a substitute for real insight. Affiliate marketing is no longer just a growth add-on; in many categories it’s a strategic lever that shapes discovery and long-term visibility. And finally, update your core pages often, watch the technical fundamentals (like whether the pricing page is indexable), and keep your distribution channels diversified so one platform’s disruption won’t sink your growth.

If you’re a marketer, founder, or growth leader, focus on the foundation: homepage, pricing, key landing pages, and a compact list of priority posts. Then add affiliates early if you need to shape category conversation. Use AI to speed up the work, but keep humans in the driver’s seat for voice and angle. Do that, and you’ll build content that actually moves the business.

Final thought

I loved talking with Mukund about this—if you want to dive deeper on any of the tactics above (keyword clustering, affiliate compensation math, onboarding affiliates, or how to structure quarterly content refreshes), I’m happy to share templates and examples. Start small, iterate, and always ask: will this content or program still be driving value in six months? If not, rethink it.

Subscribe to my YouTube Channel


Subscribe

AdTech and AI with Vibhor Kapoor: Navigating the Future of Marketing Technology

 In the rapidly evolving world of advertising technology, few leaders stand out with as much insight and forward-thinking vision as Vibhor Kapoor, President at AdRoll. With a rich career spanning Microsoft, Adobe, Twilio Segment, and now AdRoll, Vibhor brings a unique perspective on how AI, data, and personalization are reshaping the marketing landscape. In this article, I’ll share an in-depth conversation that delves into how AI is transforming adtech, the complexities of the digital advertising ecosystem, and the exciting challenges and opportunities ahead for marketers and brands alike.

From Engineering to Marketing: A Journey Fueled by Customer-Centric Innovation

My journey into technology and marketing wasn’t a straight path. It began with a passion for engineering and a desire to communicate the value of technology to customers. Early on, I realized that to truly serve customers, I needed to understand their challenges firsthand. So I transitioned from sales to building technology products—spending over a decade driving change and helping teams adopt new ways of working. Technology change isn’t just about software; it’s about evolving processes and mindsets.

Eventually, I gravitated towards marketing, which itself was undergoing a transformation. Marketing became a blend of left-brain analytics and right-brain creativity—an exciting space where data, experimentation, and rapid iteration met storytelling and brand building. For the last 15 years, I have stayed in this intersection, helping organizations harness data-driven marketing to grow and innovate.

AdRoll and the Role of AI in Programmatic Advertising

Today, I lead marketing at AdRoll, a programmatic advertising platform that partners with brands and agencies to drive full-funnel, multi-channel marketing. We help businesses reach new customers and nurture prospects across various digital channels—from connected TV to premium publishers like The New York Times and CNN. At our core, we’re an adtech company powered by data and machine learning.

AI is deeply embedded in what we do. For over 15 years, we have leveraged machine learning to analyze bidstream and ad engagement data, helping us predict which ads will resonate best with specific audiences. Our proprietary large language model adds another layer of sophistication, enabling smarter campaign creation and optimization.

But AI’s impact goes beyond just our product. Internally, we use AI to enhance marketing workflows, customer success, and content production. For example, we’ve developed conversational AI assistants that allow marketers to create campaigns, track performance, and optimize budgets using natural language interfaces instead of complex dashboards. This approach simplifies campaign management and improves efficiency.

Prioritizing AI Applications: Where to Focus for Maximum Impact

One of the biggest challenges with AI is deciding where to apply it. The temptation to “AI everything” can lead to paralysis or endless experiments that never reach production. At AdRoll, we prioritize AI initiatives based on deep insights from our product, customer conversations, and data analysis.

The key theme is synthesis—helping marketers make sense of vast, complex data sets that are impossible for humans to process manually. Our customers often run tens or hundreds of campaigns across geographies, industries, and objectives. Optimizing budgets, messaging, and channels at this scale is daunting.

AI helps by providing intelligent recommendations—such as when and how to shift budgets between campaigns within guardrails set by the marketer. This not only improves performance but also reduces manual workload. While many platforms offer AI-powered campaign creation for efficiency, the real game-changer is AI that acts as a co-pilot, synthesizing data and guiding decision-making.

The Complex AdTech Ecosystem: AI’s Role Across the Value Chain

The advertising technology ecosystem is notoriously complex. It involves multiple players—from brands and agencies to content publishers, demand-side platforms (DSPs), supply-side platforms (SSPs), and a host of intermediaries. Navigating this trillion-dollar industry requires deep expertise and coordination.

AI’s potential to improve productivity spans the entire value chain, but I see the most interesting dynamics at the two ends of the spectrum:

  • Brands and Agencies: AI enables smarter audience identification, campaign planning, and performance forecasting. With so many signals and personalization opportunities, AI enhances return on ad spend (ROAS), cost per click (CPC), and cost per mille (CPM) metrics.
  • Content Publishers: Publishers face headwinds from the rise of walled gardens like Instagram and Reddit, which keep users locked into their ecosystems. These publishers must rethink their revenue models, balancing advertising with subscription and paid content strategies.

Ad-supported publishers are innovating in the face of these challenges, exploring hybrid models to sustain quality journalism and content creation. AI will play a crucial role in optimizing ad placements and personalizing experiences, but the broader business model evolution is equally important.

AI-Generated Content and the Future of Creative Marketing

With AI increasingly capable of generating content and optimizing ad placements, one might wonder if human creativity and brand authenticity will be sidelined. I believe the opposite is true. AI-generated content can break the inertia of creativity by providing scalable tools, but it heightens the need for brands to focus on authenticity, messaging, and identity.

Creative tools like Adobe Firefly, Runway, and Sora offer unprecedented content velocity, but the fundamental question remains: who are you as a brand, and what problem are you solving for your audience? Data and AI give marketers the power to hyper-personalize and scale, but the responsibility to maintain authenticity and emotional connection is greater than ever.

Reimagining Marketing Workflows with AI

AI’s impact goes beyond content creation and campaign management. Marketing organizations have many internal workflows—content production, social media posting, performance analysis, demo bookings—that are ripe for automation. Many of these processes involve repetitive, mundane tasks that AI can handle efficiently.

However, simply layering AI onto existing workflows yields marginal benefits. The real value comes from reimagining workflows from an AI-first perspective, redesigning processes to leverage AI’s strengths fully.

For example, tools like relay.app provide extensive libraries to automate sales and marketing workflows. We are actively exploring such solutions internally to free our teams from routine tasks, allowing them to focus on strategic and creative work.

Embracing Full Automation: Real-World Applications

Personally, I’ve automated many aspects of my content production and outreach. Until recently, I had a team of four people editing videos, transcribing content, and repurposing it for blogs and social media. Today, this entire process is automated using AI tools like NA10, saving time and resources.

I’ve also built custom GPT models that analyze conversation transcripts, extract insights, and provide contextual prompts. This enhances recall and helps integrate knowledge seamlessly into workflows.

Similarly, at AdRoll, we have automated LinkedIn and email outreach, routing incoming demo requests to AI-powered systems that generate personalized product demos based on customer data—all without human intervention. This kind of automation improves scalability and customer experience.

Looking Ahead: The AI-Driven Future of Marketing

As we move forward, AI will become even more integral to marketing technology. The next frontier involves deeper integration of AI into both products and internal business processes. Marketers must balance embracing automation with preserving creativity and authenticity.

The challenges are complex, but so are the opportunities. By harnessing AI to synthesize data, optimize campaigns, automate workflows, and generate content, marketers can unlock new levels of efficiency and impact. But success requires thoughtful prioritization, continuous learning, and a commitment to understanding and serving customers better.

In this ever-changing landscape, the key to thriving is not just adopting AI but reimagining how we work and connect with audiences. The future of adtech and marketing is bright, and I’m excited to be part of the journey.

Marketing Is Not a Vending Machine — And That’s a Good Thing with Kathleen Schaub

So I just listened to this fascinating conversation with Kathleen Schaub — longtime tech marketer, ex-IDC CMO advisor, and now author of “The Really Big, Messy, Real World: Rewire Your Marketing Organization to Navigate Anything.”First off, yes, that title is a mouthful — but once she explained it, I got it. Marketing is messy, unpredictable, and human. It’s not some vending machine where you put in budget and pipeline pops out. And if you’ve ever tried to forecast your lead flow by campaign type and then had it all go sideways? You know exactly what she means.

Kathleen’s been in the game a long time. From retail marketing to product marketing to working with hundreds of CMOs across startups and tech giants alike during her decade at IDC. What’s cool is she’s seen the patterns — the hype cycles, the disconnects, the exec team misalignments — and now she’s putting that into a framework we can actually use. Not another “do these five tactics and win marketing” book, but a legit mindset shift.

The whole thesis of her book is that we need to rewire how we think about marketing. Because the world has changed — and keeps changing faster than we can keep up. AI, customer behavior shifts, macroeconomic swings… it’s chaos. And we’re trying to navigate it with models built for a more linear, controlled world.

One thing Kathleen says really stuck with me: “Marketing is more like the stock market or the weather.” And if you’ve ever run a multi-touch attribution model or tried to get sales to align with brand campaigns, you know exactly how unpredictable that system is. It’s not about control. It’s about adaptation.

She spent a bunch of time studying other complex, turbulent environments — like emergency response teams, the military, even healthcare — to see how they operate under chaos. What can marketers learn from them? Turns out, a lot.

Her approach boils down to two foundational capabilities: agility and what she calls “market system health.” Think of agility as your ability to respond and adapt quickly — pretty straightforward. But market system health? That’s more like building up your immune system. You can’t avoid every downturn or misfire, but if your org is resilient, you’ll bounce back faster.

Now, the mindsets part is where it gets practical.

Kathleen lays out four marketing mindsets in the book. My favorite? “Think like an investor.” Instead of seeing marketing spend as a cost center, she wants CMOs and founders to think like they’re making bets — strategic, long-term investments aimed at creating future value. You wouldn’t yank all your money out of a 401(k) because one quarter underperformed, right?

She also talks about shifting from linear planning to navigation. Picture plotting a boat journey: you’ve got a destination, but you need to adjust course constantly due to currents, storms, or obstacles. That’s how modern marketing should operate — iteratively, flexibly. There’s even a concept she mentions called wayfinding (from the world of design), which is about finding your path even in unfamiliar territory.

Naturally, the topic of AI came up. Kathleen was refreshingly grounded about it. Yes, CMOs and marketers are under pressure to “do more with less” thanks to AI hype. Yes, AI tools like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, etc., are now everywhere. But she made a critical point — most people are still using AI for surface-level stuff like writing emails faster or tweaking ad copy. The real opportunity is in the analytical and strategic side — using AI to augment decision-making, model scenarios, and understand the why, not just the what.

She’s especially intrigued by causal AI, which can help answer those deeper “what-if” questions and identify triggers and indicators that can drive smarter strategies. Way more valuable than basic predictive analytics — which, let’s face it, most companies aren’t even doing well yet.

Another important topic they covered was the evolving role of the CMO. Is marketing gaining more influence or losing it to CROs? Kathleen had a nuanced take: it’s less about titles and more about integration. The future isn’t sales vs. marketing, but blending both at the edge. She’s not against CROs per se, but she warns against making them just glorified sales leaders with a sprinkle of marketing.

In fact, she flipped the script and asked: What if marketing owned revenue? Could marketers actually lead the revenue charge instead of reporting to it? Her answer: yes — if they can shift their mindset from running a department to influencing the entire business. That’s the level of strategic thinking the next-gen marketing leader needs.

And here’s what I appreciated most — she’s not pretending to have all the answers. The book isn’t a checklist; it’s a map for developing your org, your team, and your thinking. Some parts are easy. Others take real work. But the underlying truth is simple: the world is uncertain, messy, and unpredictable — and marketing should stop pretending it isn’t.

Like she said at the end, quoting from a book on resilience: “If we cannot control the volatile tides of change, we can learn to build better boats.” Kathleen’s book? It’s a blueprint for building that better boat.